(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.04.23 2014나32872

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 2015.04.23 2014나32872

구상금

Text

1. Defendant, among the parts against the Defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance, whose payments exceed the following amounts:

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is an insurance company entrusted by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs with a guarantee business for automobile accident compensation pursuant to the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and the Defendant is the owner of a CF small vehicle (hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

B. On April 22, 2011, the Defendant lent the instant vehicle to E, who was on leave in the military forces, and D, on April 24, 2011, had five persons (including victims E (hereinafter “victims”) from the birth-friendly B (high school year 2) and five persons (including victims E (hereinafter “victims”) who were at the age of 17) who were on board the instant vehicle; (c) had the two-lanes of the instant vehicle moved to B while driving the vehicle on board the instant vehicle; (d) around 01:35, the instant vehicle was moved to the front left side of the instant vehicle without a driver’s license, and the front left side of the instant vehicle was moved to the front left side of the instant two-lane road by taking the front of the instant two-lanes of the instant vehicle’s traffic accident from the front side to the front side of the Sindong Police Station at the speed of 70km, and the two-lanes of the instant vehicle changed to the front left side of the instant vehicle.

(D) Due to the instant accident, the victim suffered injury in need of 10 prudent treatment, such as the pressure table set forth in Section 3 of the right frame and the pressure table. E. Meanwhile, the instant vehicle was non-insurance vehicles, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 10 million in total as medical expenses, etc. from June 15, 2011 to November 30, 201 under the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act. [Grounds for recognition] There is no dispute over the instant accident, and Party A’s evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 8, and 9 (including each number, and the purport of the entire pleadings).

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff.

참조조문

-자동차손해배상 보장법

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 2015.05.01 2014가단75120

-창원지방법원 2015.10.02 2014가단80313

-창원지방법원 2015.10.28 2015고단1817

-창원지방법원 2017.10.19 2017고단2781

-창원지방법원 2016.10.11 2016고단2761