1. The defendant shall submit the whole list of the plaintiffs (appointed parties) and the designated parties listed in the separate sheet No. 1, and the entire list No. 2.

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is a project undertaker who constructed and sold six apartment units located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant apartment units”) and 299 households located in Yeongdeungpo-gu (hereinafter “instant apartment units”).

Plaintiff

Among the apartment of this case, the "Dong and lake" column in the attached Table 3 shall be the sectional owners of each corresponding unit.

B. Public announcement of invitation of residents, sales contract, and approval for use of the apartment of this case obtained business approval from the head of Yeongdeungpo-gu on July 6, 2007.

On August 13, 2007, the defendant announced the public announcement after obtaining approval of the public announcement of the invitation of residents, and received the application for parcelling-out from August 29, 2007, and concluded the sales contract for the apartment of this case with the plaintiff, etc. respectively.

After completion of the new construction of the instant apartment, the Defendant obtained approval from the head of Yeongdeungpo-gu on February 19, 2010 for the use of the instant apartment.

C. The defect occurred in the apartment of this case and the defect repair cost incurred in the construction of the new apartment of this case, or the construction of the new apartment of this case was to be performed by the defendant, or the defect occurred in the section for common use and section for exclusive use of the apartment of this case due to the defective construction or the alteration of the plan differently from the drawing. Accordingly, the defect occurred in the apartment of this case.

Accordingly, the Plaintiffs continuously requested the Defendant to repair the defects that occurred in the instant apartment from June 15, 2010 to December 30, 2013 through the council of occupants’ representatives comprised of the Plaintiff, etc., but still there exists any defect as indicated in the attached Tables 4-1 and 2 (hereinafter “instant defect”) in the instant apartment, and in order to repair the apartment, the Plaintiffs still demand the following expenses on the premise that “part of the outer wall,” after repairing the outer wall rupture.

(unit: One year after the approval for use of the divided cost of repairing defects (wons, but less than won; hereinafter the same shall apply).