The judgment of the court below is reversed.

As to the crime of No. 1 in the judgment of the defendant, the crime of No. 2 in the judgment of the court below is four months.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentence (the crime of No. 1 and No. 2 as indicated in the lower judgment: Imprisonment with prison labor for each of six months) is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of Article 1 of the decision of the court below is that the defendant, as if he would sell 200 tons of the sn beam 200 tons of the sn beam sn beam 200 tons of the victim E, was delivered from E as contract deposit, and the defendant would have E pay 5 million won of the purchase and sale contract deposit, and the defendant would be liable in light of the degree of deception and the amount of fraud. The crime of Article 2 of the decision of the court below is that the defendant used the name and false resident registration number of "J" and used the temporary materials constructed from the victim I to lease them, and he did not pay 4 million won of the material rent from the contractor, even though he was paid all the construction cost from the contractor, in light of the degree of deception, and the number of crimes, the crime is not proper, the damage to the victims is not recovered, the defendant submitted the "written opinion" for the crime of Articles 1 and 2 of the judgment of the court below, and the defendant was punished for a prolonged period of 10 million won of execution.

On the other hand, the defendant seems to have repaid KRW 10 million to E of the victim of the crime set forth in No. 1 of the judgment of the court below which became final and conclusive, and the defendant paid KRW 10 million to the victim I of the crime set forth in No. 2 of the judgment of the court below which became final and conclusive, and the victim I did not want punishment against the defendant. The crime set forth in No. 1 of the judgment of the court below is the crime of forging private documents set forth in the judgment of the court below which became final and conclusive, and the crime set forth in No. 2 of the judgment of the court below with the crime of embezzlement set forth in the judgment of the court below and the crime set forth in