1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff is a corporation that operates urban bus transportation business using 150 full-time workers, and the intervenor has been employed on June 19, 2009 as a driver.

B. On April 23, 2014, the Plaintiff dismissed the Intervenor as of May 1, 2014 due to the grounds for disciplinary action as follows.

(hereinafter “instant dismissal”). Disciplinary Reason (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason”)

1. The intervenor involved in the accident at the time of March 13, 2014 caused an accident (the injury to be fluored in the left hand) involving the passengers in the train due to a sudden stop in the off-to-west apartment site during the course of entering the off-distance from the long-distance to the north market, and the injury requiring the stability and medical treatment of the passengers in the train for three weeks (the salt and tension of the drilling, the salt and tension of the slurin, the slurine and tension of the slurin, the slurines of the slurin, and the entire slur in the left hand). The estimated medical expenses and the agreed amount: 1,9

2. Receipt of a civil petition for traffic inconvenience;

A. On February 26, 2014, around 10:6098: (a) telephone communications (explosive to accident risk) twice between the transmission details to the new market; and (b) the 2001 Asia-Ullll apartment sections (explosive to the accident risk).

(b) A civil petition for non-stopping at a remaining bus stops around February 28, 2014, No. 5989, 10:10;

C. On March 24, 2014, around 10:03, around 6048, customers were classified as a bar level.

Belgiums and low-speed cars (exploiting to risk of accident) other than stopping places without hearing Belgiums;

(d) No. 5981, April 3, 2014; 16:17; the occurrence of a non-stop-free civil petition at a fenced village stop-an administrative disposition taken by the Bupyeong-gu Office;

C. On May 1, 2014, the Intervenor asserted that the instant dismissal constituted unfair dismissal, and applied for unfair dismissal. On July 28, 2014, the Incheon District Labor Relations Commission accepted the above application for relief on the ground that “the grounds for disciplinary action are recognized as all, but it requires disciplinary action.”

Accordingly, on September 1, 2014, the Plaintiff applied for reexamination to the National Labor Relations Commission (hereinafter “China”) (hereinafter “Central Labor Relations Commission”), but the Central Labor Relations Commission (hereinafter “Central Labor Relations Commission”) applied for reexamination on the same ground as Incheon Labor Relations Commission on November 19, 2014.