A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On August 27, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. at the Suwon District Court on November 19, 2014, and completed the execution of each sentence at the Net Prison on December 3, 2017, by being sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on November 19, 2014.

[Criminal facts]

1. On August 5, 2018, the Defendant, located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, located in D4 heading, and the victim E was stolen by taking advantage of cresh and cresh and 200,000 won in cash on the victim’s head. One resident registration certificate, one deposit passbook, deposit passbook, receipt certificate, and qualification certificate.

2. On September 11, 2018, the Defendant: (a) opened and entered the entrance door of a passenger car at the seat of 50,000,000 the market price set by the victim F without correcting the vehicle door at around 04:0,00, 201, 16, 201, o.e., o., o., o.b., o., o., o.b., the Defendant: (b) driven a car at the seat of the vehicle; and (c) o.b.,

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. E statements;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Requests for appraisal of field fingerprints and verification of identity of the fingerprint of the theft incident;

1. Detection photographs of damaged articles;

1. Previous convictions: Inquiries about criminal history, reporting on investigation (verification of crimes during the period of repeated crime) and application of Acts and subordinate statutes in one copy of the status of personal confinement;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Code aggravated concurrent crimes is that the defendant led to confessions and reflects each of the crimes of this case, the car as indicated in the judgment among the larceny crimes of this case was recovered, and the victim seeks a preference against the defendant. Meanwhile, in light of the circumstances of each of the crimes of this case, the method and amount of damage, etc., the nature of the crime is not less easily, and the defendant was sentenced to the same crime as indicated in the judgment and completed the execution thereof, and he is not aware of it during the period of repeated crimes.