logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.11.28 2018나20056
공사대금
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. As to the cause of claim

A. According to the purport of evidence evidence Nos. 7, 9 through 12, evidence Nos. 1 and 2, and the purport of the entire pleadings, the following facts can be acknowledged: (a) the Plaintiff prepared a written estimate to obtain a subcontract for the construction works set forth in the table Nos. 1 through 8 from the Defendant; (b) the Defendant paid the Plaintiff the construction cost as indicated in the table Nos. 1 through 5, and No. 8’s payment amount; (c) the fact that the Plaintiff received the construction cost from the Defendant and then issued the tax invoice to the Defendant as listed in the table Nos. 1 through 5, and 8 below.

5. The payment amount of the construction cost (including KRW 1, value-added tax) paid by the Defendant on the 5-day estimate for construction (including KRW 30,000) and the unpaid construction cost (cost) on April 17, 2015 of the Plaintiff, 1,294,700, 1,294,700, 1,700, 1,700 on April 30, 2015; 1,705, 1,705, 30, 60, 30, 40, 50, 60, 30, 50, 50, 30, 50, 50, 50, 50, 30, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 40, 50, 50, 145, 2015

arrow