logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.08.14 2012고단2768
상표법위반
Text

Defendants are not guilty.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. Defendant A is the executive director of Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Kap Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Ltd., and is a person in charge of overall control over the import and business management of Kafs produced at a Chinese plant.

No one shall deliver, sell, forge, imitate, or possess a trademark identical or similar to another person's registered trademark for the purpose of using or making another person use such trademark on goods identical or similar to the designated goods.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 중국 산동성 웬뎅 H에 있는 ㈜B 중국현지공장에서, 상표권자인 미합중국 더폴로/로렌 컴퍼니, LP.사(대한민국 특허청 제0410770호 지정상품 머플러 등으로 상표등록)의 허락 없이 임의로 제작된 랄프로렌 스카프 1,067점 시가 179,256,000원을 I에 선적하여 인천항으로 입항하여 수입한 것을 비롯하여 별지 범죄일람표 기재와 같이 6종 12,297점 정품 시가 합계 401,570,840원 상당을 상표권자의 허락 없이 임의로 국내에 수입함으로써 상표권자의 상표권을 침해하였다.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the trademark right by using or possessing a trademark identical or similar to the registered trademark of another person on goods identical or similar to the designated goods.

B. Defendant B, at the same time and place as above, committed an act of violation by the Executive Director A, an employee of the Defendant, as above.

2. Determination

A. The Defendants and the defense counsel’s assertion (1) scarf products that were prosecuted in the instant case are so-called “Obert” products that were normally produced in the Chinese factory in accordance with the orders of the trademark right holder, etc. (in the case of ordinary orders, 10% of the ordered products are additionally produced in addition to the ordered products, taking into account defective or damaged parts into account.)

Defendant

For export purposes in China.

arrow