logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2021.01.21 2020나2014428
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court of first instance as to this case are stated are as follows. The reasons why the part of the judgment of first instance is stated are as follows (the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act). [Attachment] 5, 3 through 4, and 6, 11: Of the reasons of the judgment of first instance, part of the judgment of first instance as follows: 5, 5, through 14, among the reasons of the judgment of first instance, "the court of first instance" of the judgment of first instance, "the court of first instance" of "the court of first instance: 2. The main points of the plaintiffs' assertion are as follows: 2. The deceased complained of clinical symptoms that could be suspected of being suspected of being sexual beer at the time of his application to the emergency room of the defendant hospital.

Nevertheless, the medical team at Defendant Hospital had an opportunity for early diagnosis and treatment of chrone gymnasty by conducting a chest and heart chronological examination and a chest chronological examination late.

In addition, the medical team of the defendant hospital was able to have sufficiently doubtful or discovered the boomer's booming booming symptoms as a result of the examination of the body and the BT for the deceased, without any doubt even though it was able to do so, the medical team of the defendant hospital provided advice or assistance to the relevant medical professionals, or provided additional tests, and taken measures for release only with additional treatment and prescription.

The Deceased, due to the medical negligence of the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital, provided an opportunity for early diagnosis and treatment of the cryprym crymosis and died.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay damages of KRW 244,00,000 (=236,50,000,000 for damages of the deceased’s damage sustained by the deceased’s heir (=215,50,000 consolation money of KRW 21,50,000 for lost income) out of the deceased’s funeral expenses paid by the Plaintiff A), to the Plaintiff, the sole heir of the deceased’s heir, who is the deceased’s interest mother, and the Defendant is obligated to pay damages of KRW 3,00,000 for consolation money of KRW 1,50,000 for the deceased’s funeral expenses [3,00,000 for consolation money of KRW 21,00 for lost income] of the deceased’s funeral expenses.

Of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, 6 Myeon 12-13: Man-2, part of the 6 Myeon 13: “No. 6-5 Ga 6-5” means the evidence 6-2.

arrow