1. The Defendant’s loans to the Plaintiff, Jinwon District Court, Jinwon District Court, Jinwon District Court, 2015j76.

1. The facts below the basis facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the whole purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including where there are serial numbers).

On October 1, 2014, the Plaintiff prepared and awarded to the Defendant a certificate of borrowing KRW 95,00,000, and the repayment period as of December 31, 2014.

B. C(D) takes the Plaintiff as the obligee as the obligor, and “1. The obligee, upon request of the obligor who was in close friendly relationship, has paid the Plaintiff KRW 95,00,000 on October 1, 201, with the repayment order up to December 31, 2014. However, even after the due date, the obligor urged the obligor to pay the unpaid amount several times, but the obligor would have avoided the obligor’s voluntary repayment, and thus, the obligor would have received this case’s request for the same decision as stated in the above purport of the claim, and the obligor would have been issued at KRW 15,00,00 and KRW 25,00 from the date of delivery of the original payment order from January 1, 2015 to the date of delivery of the original payment order, and KRW 15,500 per annum of the instant case’s claim for the payment of KRW 75,50,000,000 from the original payment order, and the Defendant received each of the above KRW 175,5,5,015.

C. On July 14, 2017, the Plaintiff’s claim against the instant payment order.

The plaintiff is aware of the defendant's punishment in the same region after the end of 2012.