The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence of the lower court (two years of suspended execution in August, community service hours, and forty hours of attending a compliance driving course) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below acknowledged the defendant's mistake and agreed smoothly with the victim, but in this case, the defendant was found to have received the victim who dried the crosswalk while driving a vehicle in violation of the signal, and the defendant's negligence is considerably significant. The victim in this case was engaged in an injury requiring about seven weeks' medical treatment, and the victim was punished for the same kind of crime that caused the death of pedestrians while driving a vehicle in 2009. In addition, considering the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, and environment, the defendant's punishment of the court below is too excessive, and thus it is not deemed unfair. Thus, the defendant's argument is groundless.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.