A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On June 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) opened the entrance of “C” agents located in front of the wife population B, which was reported to the scene on June 12, 2014, and obstructed police officers’ legitimate performance of official duties in relation to the handling of reports and maintenance of order by police officers, by assaulting “C” agents, including the head of the Dong-dong Police Station D District, G, and F, who called on the site after receiving a report of 112, and dispatched to the site. The Defendant used “Y Ma-dong Police Agency, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, Ma-dong, to the face of the above E, and f.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of respective Acts and subordinate statutes of E, G and H;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] Where the scope of mitigation area (one month to eight months), mitigation area (special mitigation person] [decision of sentence] assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor (decision of sentence] the defendant reflects his/her mistake, there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine, and the punishment is determined as ordered in consideration of the sentencing conditions of the same kind of crime, etc.