logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.05.07 2019노3929
전자금융거래법위반등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The defendant is the defendant, who is an applicant for compensation, 1,725,00 won, and 1,725,00 won.

Reasons

1. The gist of the grounds of appeal by the defendant concerning the appeal by the defendant is that the punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment) sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable, but the defendant committed the crime by keeping the physical card while promising to be used for the crime, and the defendant committed the crime by repeating it for a long time against many victims, the damage was most not recovered, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and conduct, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

2. According to the records of the judgment on the application for remedy order at the trial, the Defendant is liable to pay the above defrauded money to the applicant for compensation at the trial. The Defendant is liable to pay the above money to the applicant for compensation at the trial. The Defendant is liable to pay the above money to the applicant for compensation at the trial.

(AD, an applicant for compensation, sought compensation of KRW 2,00,00 from this court 2019 early 3374,000. However, the part exceeding KRW 1,725,00 is not clear as to whether it is subject to compensation order, whether it is liable for compensation or not, or its scope is not clear, so it is limited to the part of the above fraud, and the application for compensation order (No. 2019 early 3375) filed by AD, an applicant for compensation, which is the applicant for compensation in duplicate, is dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the ground that the appeal by the defendant is without merit, and the application for compensation by the applicant for compensation is dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and is well-grounded, it is so decided as per Disposition by attaching a sentence to provisional execution pursuant to Article 31 (3) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings.

arrow