All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal asserts that the defendant is too unreasonable because of the fact that the sentence of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the sentence of the court below is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. We examine both parties’ assertion of unfair sentencing.

The circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the confession of the defendant, the fact that the defendant is living in custody for about five months, the amount of profit earned by the defendant in the course of the crime in this case is judged not to be significant, and the fact that the defendant does not have the same criminal power.

On the other hand, the crime of this case is a fraud which has great harm to our society, and is planned and organized in the form of an organization to commit a crime, and it is not easy for accomplices to gain benefits from the crime and arrest and punish the principal offender who led the crime. In order to suppress this crime, it is necessary to strictly punish the withdrawn measures. In particular, in light of the following: (a) the defendant did not play a role as a mere "passing", but rather carried out a role as a "passing" with the awareness that he participated in the crime; (b) the victims of the crime of this case are many victims and victims are unable to obtain a minimum of KRW 200,000 through KRW 410,000,000 due to their economic difficulties; and (c) the defendant did not receive any damage from the crime under normal circumstances.

The circumstances mentioned above, the age, character and conduct, environment, and other arguments in this case are shown.