beta
Text
Defendant
A A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, each of which shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is the former husband of the H other than the case where he worked as a nurse for the "G hospital" in the F in Mapo-si, and the defendant C is the birth of A, the defendant B is the mother of A and C, and the defendant D is the wife of C.
The Defendants thought H was the victim I and the Buddhist relationship, and tried to find it at the above hospital operated by the victim to comply with it.
1. The Defendants jointly committed the crimes of Defendants C, B, and D / [Defamation] at the “G hospital” located in F on September 1, 2017, around 11:30, the Defendants considered that the head of the I hospital and H nurse enter the conference in the presence of J, K, L, M, etc., the employees of the above hospital. There are evidence photographs.
Both people have winded, and H nurses have taken the house.
I The failure of a family by the president was caused by the failure of a family.
“The term “ was changed”.
As a result, the Defendants conspired with each other to damage the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.
2. The joint crimes committed by Defendant A, Defendant C, Defendant B, and Defendant D [Interference with the duties] Defendants are at the same time and place as the above 1, and Defendant A “I hospital head”.
R. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.W.
Defendant C goes on the top of the highest horse at the time, “I am Ra, I am Ra, I am Ra, I am on the part of Defendant D, and a victim’s hospital room at several times, and Defendant D am on the part of Defendant C and on the part of the Defendant C, “I am ben, I am swe am swe swe n when you go at the two telecom.”
” 고 소리치고, 피고인 B 역시 “ 아무것도 없는 애를 데려와서 학교까지 다 가르쳐 놨으면 고마운 줄 알아야지
It was difficult to avoid disturbance within the hospital for about 2 hours, such as making noise “influence”.
As a result, the Defendants conspired with and by force interfered with the victim's hospital business.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to I;
1. The relevant Article of the Criminal Act and the defendant A who has chosen a sentence against the crime;