A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) opened a steering 15,000 won in cash stored in the vehicle, which was parked in front of the Central Liber-ro 98, Sincheon-gu, Yacheon-gu, Yacheon-gu; and (b) committed a theft of KRW 15,000 in cash stored in the vehicle; (c) from around that time to July 21, 2016, the Defendant committed a theft of the property owned by the victims in the same way six times in total from Japan to July 21, 2016; and (d) attempted to steals two times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Descriptions of each E, F, G, C, H, and I;

1. Entry in the protocol of seizure;

1. Application of each Act or subordinate statute to include investigation reports (the case of transactions of transportation cards used by a suspect) and the details of transactions of card with a producer attached thereto, and the details of transactions of Korean smart cards;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection: The defendant confessions all of the crimes of this case, seems to have divided his errors, and most of the victims have recovered from damage and have reached an agreement, etc.; the crime of this case is committed several times, and the crime of this case is committed intentionally and intentionally, and the nature of the crime is not good. The defendant has already been punished by a fine for the same kind of crime, and the amount of the theft of this case and the time for self-esteem was reduced for a certain period.