logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원고등법원 2020.01.15 2019나14499
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Plaintiffs, which orders additional payment, shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasons why the court accepted the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasons of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for dismissal or addition as set forth in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. A mark from 4 to 5 pages shall be added to the following:

순번 원고 계약일 분양자 (피고) 분양호실 총 계약 면적(㎡) 분양대금(원) 소유권이전일 1 A 2015. 5. 15. N V동 W호 128.015 310,000,000 2017. 1. 3. 2 B 2015. 5. 27. V동 X호 126.65 310,000,000 2016. 12. 9. 3 C 2015. 5. 17. V동 Y호 128.67 310,000,000 2016. 12. 13. 4 D 2015. 5. 29. V동 Z호 128.67 310,000,000 2016. 12. 6. 5 E 2015. 12. 31 O AA동 W호 129.01 325,000,000 2016. 12. 8. 6 F 2015. 11. 24. AA동AB호 129.01 325,000,000 2016. 12. 16. 7 G 2015. 11. 24. AA동 X호 129.01 325,000,000 2016. 12. 16. 8 H 2015. 9. 14. AA동 Y호 129.01 310,000,000 2016. 12. 13. 2016. 2. 24. AA동AC호 129.01 325,000,000 2016. 12. 23. 9 I 2015. 9. 7. AA동AD호 129.01 310,000,000 2016. 12. 9. 10 J 2015. 8. 31. AA동 Z호 128.98 310,000,000 2016. 12. 9. 11 K 2015. 6. 1. P AE동 Y호 127.20 310,000,000 2016. 12. 9. 5쪽 표 아래 3줄의 ‘원고 A’을 ‘AI(원고 A의 처)’로, ‘B’을 ‘원고 B’으로 각 고치고, 같은 줄의 ‘M’를 삭제한다.

7 The testimony of the witness AH by the court of first instance is regarded as “the testimony of the witness AH by the court of first instance, and the result of the plaintiff F himselfgy examination by the court of first instance.”

7 The following shall be added to 20 lines:

No. 4. The testimony of this Court at AJ by the witness of this Court is as follows: (a) it is difficult to see that the above witness, who was in charge of the duties of the chief of the headquarters in charge of the supply and demand of employees or the management of employees, was educated or directly involved in the sales contract of this case; and (b) it is insufficient to reverse the above judgment and 18/10 of 9.10.

“2) In the instant case, the Defendants as seen earlier.

arrow