1. The Defendant’s loan case against the Plaintiff at the Daegu District Court, the Daegu District Court rendered October 18, 2017, 2017Kadan1769 Decided October 18, 2017.

1. The fact that the plaintiff has fully repaid to the defendant the obligations (including auction expenses) under the judgment in Paragraph (1) of this Article (hereinafter “the judgment of this case”) does not conflict between the parties, or that the statement in No. 14 of evidence No. 14 is recognized by considering the overall purport of the pleadings.

According to the above facts, since the debt under the judgment of this case has ceased to exist by repayment, compulsory execution based on the judgment of this case shall not be permitted.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.