logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.05.12 2015나2052563
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Plaintiff 1, among the parts against the Defendants in the judgment of the court of first instance, falls under the following amount which orders payment.

Reasons

1. The court of first instance partly accepted the Plaintiff’s claims against the Defendants, and dismissed the Plaintiff’s respective remaining claims against the Defendants, and all of the claims against the Codefendant A Accounting Corporation and C in the first instance trial.

As to the part against the Defendants in the judgment of the court of first instance against the Plaintiff, since Defendant B appealed against the losing part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the actual subject of the judgment of this court is limited to the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant B and the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant D, E, and F among the claims against Defendant D, E, and F in the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff’s status as the parties is a company aimed at financial product brokerage services, etc., and is the Nonghyup Bank Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “CF”) on March 2, 2012.

(2) Defendant B, as a certified public accountant belonging to A Accounting Corporation (hereinafter “A Accounting Corporation”), was a representative accountant of A Accounting Corporation (hereinafter “A Accounting Corporation”), and Defendant D, as a certified public accountant belonging to A Accounting Corporation, was working at A Accounting Corporation Gangnam branch, and Defendant E and F received loans from the AF branch in its name.

B. Defendant E’s loan 1) Defendant B and E, etc. forged the certified public accountant registration certificate of Defendant E even though Defendant E is not a certified public accountant on November 2012, 2012, and Defendant E applied for the loan of “scisf loan”, which is a loan product for professional employees, to Defendant E’s employee, who is the Plaintiff’s employee in charge of the loan recruitment business, submitted a forged certified public accountant registration certificate and a false employment certificate of Defendant E, and a receipt for tax withholding of wage and salary income, and submitted it to Defendant B as if he was a certified public accountant at the Gangnam-gu branch of A accounting corporation. 2)

arrow