Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of 700,000 won.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, 100,000 won.

At around 03:10 on April 22, 2015, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim’s days of treatment, such as the victim F (the age of 58)’s wurging around the main point of “E” located in Gangnam-si D, and the victim F (the age of 58) wurged by the Defendant and A, and the victim’s wurging the victim’s wurgs around the Defendant’s wurg and the victim’s left wurging back.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant A by the police;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of fines (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Do1448, Apr. 1, 2007)

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Part concerning the rejection of prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant A);

1. On April 22, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on the part of the victim with balp flaps during a bomb, which was in front of the main point of “E” located in Gangnam-si D on April 22, 2015; and (b) on the ground that the Defendant, on the ground that he made a balp to the victim B (year 51).

2. The offense of assault against judgment shall not be prosecuted against the express will of the victim under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, it is apparent that B withdrawn the wishing to punish the defendant on October 6, 2015, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted, and therefore, this part of the prosecution is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.