1. As to the Plaintiff’s KRW 200,000,000 and KRW 100,000,00 among them, Defendant B Co., Ltd. shall start on April 30, 2015, and start on April 10, 100.

1. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2-1 and 2.

On July 16, 2013, with respect to the 16,528m2 and 4,942.05m2 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) of the land site C in Ansan-si, the Plaintiff owning the right to collateral security, the registration of creation of a mortgage (hereinafter “the instant first collateral mortgage”) consisting of KRW 100 million with the maximum debt amount, Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”), the obligor Co., Ltd., the right to collateral security (hereinafter “the instant first collateral mortgage”) and the establishment of a mortgage (hereinafter “the instant mortgage”) consisting of KRW 100 million with the maximum debt amount, ② the obligor, Defendant B, and Defendant Samsung Steel Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd. (hereinafter “SchiS Steel”), the establishment of a mortgage (hereinafter “the instant second collateral mortgage”) consisting of the instant collateral mortgage and the instant mortgage.

B. A distribution schedule of the distribution date (2,989,150,756) of the distribution date (2,989,150,756) of the real estate auction procedure (hereinafter “instant auction procedure”) under the Daegu District Court dong Branch D and E (dupl) (hereinafter “instant auction procedure”), which uses the real estate as the sold real estate, was formulated in the order of 3rd priority of KRW 100 million among the total amount of KRW 2,989,150,756, which shall be actually distributed to Defendant Steel Co., Ltd., the mortgagee of the instant case, and KRW 65,272,834, which is the mortgagee of the instant second priority of 40 million, was formulated in the order of 6th priority of the total amount of KRW 100 million. Accordingly, the said distribution schedule was also formulated in which each of the said dividends was distributed to Defendant B, the mortgagee of the instant provisional attachment.

2. Determination as to the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant Twin-use Steel

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff registered the establishment of the second neighboring steel of this case as a collateral security holder in order to secure the future product payment claim against the defendant B of Samsung Steel.

However, the defendant Samsung Steel Co., Ltd. goods to the defendant B.