1. The remainder of each land listed in the separate sheet of land, which is referred to an auction and remains after deducting auction expenses from the price;

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings, evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including paper numbers), the Plaintiff and the Defendants shared each of the instant land indicated in the separate sheet of co-ownership shares in the separate sheet of co-ownership shares, and the fact that the agreement on the partition of each of the instant land has not been reached between the Plaintiff and the Defendants can be acknowledged. As such, the Plaintiff may file a claim against the Defendants for the partition of each of the instant land.

2. In full view of the location, size, shape, utilization situation of each land of this case, relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendants and the land of this case, which is acknowledged as aggregate in evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including paper numbers) of the partition method Gap, the land of this case is difficult or inappropriate to divide in kind each of the land of this case into auction and the remaining amount obtained by deducting auction expenses from auction expenses. Thus, the land of this case is divided by means of distribution according to co-ownership share between the Plaintiff