logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.06.02 2020고단14
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a holder of a salary class B and a cargo vehicle.

On December 20, 2019, the Defendant, without a driver’s license on a motor vehicle on December 18:40, 2019, driven the foregoing cargo vehicle, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, from the front side of the Defendant’s residence in Do-si, to the front side of the dwelling of the Defendant in Do-si.

Accordingly, the defendant driving a motor vehicle without a driver's license, and operated a motor vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance.

"200 Highest 394"

1. The defendant is in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury).

On January 9, 2020, the Defendant: (a) driven the said cargo without a driver’s license on January 18, 2020; (b) driven the said cargo onto the government in the direction of “F” restaurant in front of the two weeks; and (c) by negligence, while driving the three-lanes of the four-lanes in front of the restaurant in front of the “F” restaurant in the two weeks from the direction of the transmission, the Defendant received by the victim G (F) who was driving in front of the motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle in front of the motor vehicle in front of the left at the left.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the Defendant’s crymal fluoral fluor, which requires approximately three weeks of treatment by occupational negligence as above.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Free Driver’s License) driving of the Defendant’s vehicle B, without a driver’s license, at a section of approximately 6 km from the Do in front of the Defendant’s residence to the “F” restaurant located in D at a temporary border such as the above paragraph (1).

3. No owner of any motor vehicle violating the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated B wing and freight cars without mandatory insurance at the same time and place as the above Paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

"200 Highest 14"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Mandatory insurance;

arrow