1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a commercial sex trafficking business establishment under the trade name of "G" in 303 in Kimhae-si, and Defendant B is a person who works as the head of the above business establishment and performs the management of the above business establishment.

Defendants simultaneously from around June 22, 2016 to the same year.

7. Until June 1, 200, up to the above business establishment employed the sex trafficking women, such as H and I, and received 250,000 won from the male customers without the name of J, including J, as the price for the sex trafficking, and paid 1.60,000 won out of them to the women of sexual traffic, the sexual traffic women allowed them to have sexual intercourse with the male customers with the average of two male customers per day.

As a result, Defendants conspired to act as commercial sex acts such as brokerage.

Summary of Evidence

On-site photographs of the records of seizure of the statements of J, H, K, and I by the Defendants (I telephone statements and the attachment of recorded CDs) shall be subject to the statute.

1. The Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic; Article 30 of the Criminal Act

2. The Defendants: Imprisonment with prison labor;

3. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

4. Defendant B of the protection observation: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act.

5. Defendants of the community service order: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

6. Confiscation Defendant B: The reason for the sentencing of Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, etc., is that Defendant A arranges commercial sex acts to be conducted within the main place of entertainment, which is not bad; however, considering the fact that the period of business is not longer longer, Defendant B is not a business owner, but has a significant degree of participation by residing in the place of business and being in charge of the management of the place of business; Defendant B committed the crime in question during the period of suspension of execution; and Defendant A has no criminal record of the same kind during the period of suspension of execution.