logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.24 2015가단5337634
소유권확인
Text

1. The defendant confirms that the land listed in the attached Form is owned by the plaintiffs.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Land Survey Board for the Preferred 1,470 square meters in Kug-si E means that the G with the address in Kuwon-gun F was under the circumstances. The Land Survey Board for the Preferred 122 square meters in Kuwon-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun-si-si-si is indicated as being under the circumstances by JJ having the address in Kuwon-gun-gun-gun-gun-gun

B. The Suwon-si E 1,470 square meters prior to the division was divided into 380 square meters (attached Form 1 land) of Kuwon-si K road in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and the H 122 square meters in Suwon-si H 122 square meters in Suwon-si was converted to L 281 square meters (attached Form 2 land) on October 10, 197.

C. The land cadastre of each of the instant lands is registered as the Plaintiff’s father, M, the father, and each of the instant lands is currently unregistered.

M deceased on August 19, 1981, and the plaintiffs, the spouse of N and their children jointly inherited their properties, and N died on February 10, 2005, the plaintiffs, the co-inheritors, agreed to divide their inheritance properties on January 22, 2007 at the rate of 6/18 shares, 2, C, and D, 4/18 shares, respectively.

[Grounds for Recognition: Entry of Evidence No. 1-1 to 8 of No. 8, the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts and the above evidence, G, which is the name of the situation of each land of this case, appears to be the same person as G and J, in light of their names, legal domicile and address shown in the transcript, etc., and when considering the fact that each land of this case is indicated as the father M who is the father of the plaintiffs, the preference price of the plaintiffs is deemed to have owned each land of this case. Since the plaintiffs jointly inherited each of the land of this case, the plaintiffs' assertion against the defendant to seek confirmation of ownership is with merit.

B. The Defendant’s claim is first, the land category of the instant land was changed to the road around 1935, and the land category was also changed to the general public around 1966.

arrow