The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant asserting the misapprehension of the legal principle is merely driving a vehicle in order to turn on the air condition at the time of the instant case, which does not fall under driving.

B. The sentence of the lower court on the assertion of unreasonable sentencing (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① the first witness and reporting person, at an investigative agency, reported the vehicle to the police box, which is suspected of drinking driving, that male (Defendants) saw the vehicle to sit at the vehicle seat at the time. At the same time, the police officer tried to move the vehicle of the Defendant to the scene, and 45 degrees after moving the vehicle, respectively. The police officer tried to move the vehicle to the front and rear, and 45 degrees after moving the vehicle to the front and rear. The police officer did not specifically stated the witness and reporting the vehicle to the effect that “the first witness and reporting person moved to the vehicle outside of the house to smoke at the time,” and the above E was sufficiently reliable, ② the Defendant was given a witness to the police officer to the effect that he was unable to make a false statement at the scene, and the Defendant did not directly visit the vehicle to the police officer during drinking distance at the time of reporting the vehicle to the police officer at the time of leaving the vehicle to the scene.”

this paper aims to park.