Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On August 29, 2017, the Defendant driven the above taxi on August 14:48, 2017, and continued to turn to the left at the front of the apartment complex 1, which is a 77 Modern Stetet 1, which is a pande of the Seocheon-si. In front of the apartment complex, the Defendant continued to turn to the left.

Since there is a place where traffic is controlled by signal, etc., the defendant engaged in driving motor vehicles has a duty of care to safely observe the signal and to safely turn to the left and prevent the accident.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by negligence in violation of the right turn signals, was driving by a victim C (28 tax) who was driven by a victim C (28 tax) who was driven by a victim C (28 tax) in accordance with the direct signals at the right turn.

D) The front part of the Oral Ba was received as the front part of the taxi driving by the defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as saved saves and body flaves, which require approximately eight weeks of medical treatment. The Defendant suffered injury to the victim E (V, 43 years of age) who is the above taxi customer, such as saves, flaves, etc. for approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. E statements;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on the actual condition investigation, and a medical certificate for each accident;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the order to attend a lecture is that the defendant was left left without permission due to the violation of the signal and caused the victim to suffer the breath of eight weeks of care, which is disadvantageous to the fact that the content of the crime was significant, and that it is not agreed with the victim of the taxi.