A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around July 2015, the defrauded introduced a new father of Lao nationality to offer US US US 6,000 if he/she had a male C who wants to be international marriage from the victim B, and introduced Lao to the victim and C, around August 2, 2015.

However, in fact, D was a female who was introduced by the defendant to the victim, etc. and was a person who was forced to violate the Immigration Control Act in Korea and was restricted to enter the Republic of Korea.

Around August 1, 2015, the Defendant received U.S. dollars 4,000 from the victim as an intermediary fee, and around March 20, 2016, the Defendant had the victim make a substitute payment of U.S. dollars 2,000 out of his/her debt to F, and had the victim take property benefits equivalent to the said amount.

Since it is deemed that there is no concern that there is no substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his/her right to defense, such as examination of witness, etc., this is revised without going through amendment procedures

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim, thereby taking the sum of 6,00 U.S. dollars from the victim.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Marriage Brokers Business Management Act is a person who is engaged in the international marriage brokerage business under the trade name of Kimhae-si G building and I in H.

Around October 2015, the Defendant dealt with in the process of the hearing, including the examination of witness, and it is deemed that there is no risk that the Defendant will be at a disadvantage to the Defendant’s exercise of his/her right to defense. As such, in Lao, the Defendant provided the above C with D’s unmarried certificate, health certificate, and criminal record certificate instead of personal information of E, the other party to marriage brokerage.

Accordingly, the defendant provided false personal information intentionally.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness J;

1. Statement made by witnesses B in the third protocol of the trial;

1. Statement made by K witness in the fourth protocol of the trial;

1. E statements;

1. Written confirmation of marital status;