2015 Gohap 573 Compensation (Definition)

1. 0 ① ; and

2. HOB;

3. Da03

4. Ma○○.

As the plaintiff 4 is a minor, the legal representative mother of parental authority ①

The Plaintiffs’ Address Gwangju Northern-gu

[Defendant-Appellant] Plaintiff 1 and 2 others

[Defendant-Appellee]

■■대학교병원

Gwangju Dong-gu

Representative Director I: IO

소송대리인 법무법인 ■■

담당변호사 손■■, 차■■

May 12, 2017

July 14, 2017

1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff Cho ○○, Inc., the amount of 48,359,707 won, the amount of 15% per annum from July 23, 2014 to July 14, 2017, and each of the above amounts of 27,573,138 won and the amount of 15% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment.

2. Each of the plaintiffs' remaining claims is dismissed.

3. Of the costs of lawsuit, 1/2 shall be borne by the Plaintiffs, and the remainder by the Defendant.

4. Paragraph 1 can be provisionally executed.

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff ○○(s) 82,767,087 won, plaintiff 10, 100 won, 15% per annum from July 23, 2014 to the date of full payment. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff ○○(s) 51,511,391 won, and 15% per annum from the following day to the date of full payment.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Status of the parties

(1) 피고는 광주 동구 ■■로 ** 에 있는 ■■대학교병원을 운영하는 의료법인으로, 피고가 운영하는 위 병원 소속 의료진(이하 ■■대학교병원 또는 그 의료진을 '피고병 원' 이라 한다)의 사용자이다.

(2) The plaintiff 'Oâ…… is the wife of the network o○ (hereinafter referred to as "the network"), and the plaintiff o2, o0, o0, o0, o03, and o04 are the children of the deceased.

(b) Transfer from a hospital A to a defendant hospital;

On July 22, 2014, the deceased was under the influence of alcohol on July 22, 2014 at around 23:23:25 on the same day, and was transferred to the emergency room of the A Hospital in Gwangju-gu at around 23:25, the deceased was under the influence of alcohol. The deceased was transferred to the emergency room of the A Hospital in Gwangju-gu at around 23:25 on the same day. As a result of brain-dead shooting, the reason why the cerebral throthosis was discovered (SDH), the thropoth, the blood pressure of the deceased was without awareness, 160/90mhg, and the response was under the condition of 3/3 + 3/200 on the same day. The deceased became under the control of the Defendant Hospital at around 23:52 on the same day.

(c) Measures taken by the defendant hospital before the transfer to B;

Around July 22, 2014, the Defendant hospital confirmed the condition of the deceased (120/80mhg, 36.0mhmhg, her body temperature 80.0mh, cambling water 80 times/ minutes, 20 times/minutes) and conducted a blood test on July 22, 2014, and around 00:13, the following day was conducted.

Around 00:20 on the same day, the Defendant hospital conducted brain cT photographing on the same day, and based on this, conducted the diagnosis of the blood 3 under the part of the external trauma occination which does not have two or more open addresses (Trainic subarararnoidorororide ound), and the external trauma occination (Trumatic subararararararc oundan) which does not have two open addresses.

(d) Transfer to B hospital;

The Defendant hospital recommended the Plaintiff ○○ to transfer the Deceased to C hospital or D hospital due to the lack of time for the patient room in the Defendant hospital, and due to the considerable expected surgery, it is difficult for the hospital to treat the Deceased.

그러나 원고 조○①은 주거지 인근의 B병원으로 전원하기를 희망하였고, 이에 피고 병원은 2014. 7. 23. 00:53경 망인을 광주 북구 ■■로 **번길 ** 에 있는 B병원으로 전원할 것을 결정하였다. 망인은 같은 날 01:40경 응급구조사가 동승한 구급차를 통하 여 B병원으로 이송되어4) 같은 날 01:52경 위 병원에 도착하였다.

E. The death of the decedent and the decedent of the Defendant hospital

At around 01:52 on July 23, 2014, there is a need to conduct an emergency operation, such as checking the condition of the deceased’s active fitness (the blood pressure of 170/100mhg, the body temperature of 36.5mhg, becambling 92 times / minutes, 20 times / minutes, 20 times / minutes), taking brain-related photographs at around 02:10 on the same day, to increase the blood dose and to transfer it back to the Defendant hospital at around 02:27 on the same day, and on the same day, at around 02:35 on the same day, the deceased transferred it to the Defendant hospital.

At around 02:49 on the same day, the deceased was born to the Defendant Hospital at the second time. At the Defendant Hospital, the deceased’s active chronology, etc. was confirmed (the blood pressure of 140/70mhg, physical temperature of 36.4mp, cambling water of 88/molecule, 24 / decentralization), and the deceased conducted a psychotropic examination [GCS (Grascow Common Ga Scale), Scale scre +25]; the deceased was diagnosed at the Defendant Hospital at the time of the diagnosis of the deceased, but the deceased’s active chronology, etc. was confirmed (the first operation was conducted at the time of the emergency operation, but the first operation was unlikely to be performed at the time of the emergency operation at the time of the operation, and the deceased’s death was conducted at the same 40th day of the death of the deceased and the first 7th day of the death of the hospital at around the same 705th day.

(f) Progress of cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral typology based on the details of cerebral typization;

Among the responses to this Court's appraisal request to the Korean Medical Association, the deceased's opinion of reading the details of brain photography is as follows:

① A병원CT ( 2014 . 7 . 22 . 23 : 45 촬영 )급성 지주막하 출혈이 좌측 전 - 측 - 두정엽에 보이며 좌측 경막하 출혈 소견이 보이나 양이 비교적 많지 않아 정중선 편위는 거의 없는 것으로 보임② ■■대병원CT ( 2014 . 7 . 23 . 00 : 20 촬영 )급성 지주막하 출혈이 좌측 전 - 측 - 두정엽에 보이며 좌측 경막하 출혈 소견이 보이며 우측으로정중선 편위가 4㎜정도로 측정되는 것으로 판독됨③ B병원CT ( 2014 . 7 . 23 . 02 : 10 촬영 )좌측 전 - 측 두정엽의 급성 지주막하 출혈도 악화되고 좌측 경막하 출혈 소견이 이전의 CT보다 . 더 악화되어 2m 이상의 두께로 뇌를 압박하고 있으며 우측으로 정중선 편위가 20㎜정도로치우치는 것으로 판독됨④ ■■대병원CT ( 2014 . 7 . 23 . 03 : 12 촬영 )좌측 전 - 측두정엽의 급성 지주막하 출혈도 악화되고 좌측 경막하 출혈 소견이 이전의 CT와비슷하며 2㎝ 이상의 두께로 뇌를 압박하고 있으며 우측으로 정중선 편위가 25㎜ 정도로 치우치는 것으로 판독됨

(g) Relevant medical knowledge;

(1) Henopical henopsis (blood species 6)

(A) Summary.

The blood transfusion (mathropsis) is the cerebral salute that is being covered by the brain, and is usually divided into the blood from a acute salutism and the blood from a chronic salutism. The normal death rate is more than 60% in the case of the highest upper part of the external alutism. Even if the death does not occur, it is known that there exists any serious alute disorder, and in particular, the causes of the most salutism are the fall, assault, traffic accidents, etc., and in the case of the brain of the other accident without using the safety alute, it seems that the alutical alutism seems to frequently occur when the brain of the other accident occurs without using the safety alute. In an emergency, it is obvious that the possibility of returning to the normal life before the normal life of the accident is very low.

(b) Diagnosis and treatment;

A patient with acute double damage can be said to be a basic image diagnosis method by CT rather than MI, and the blood transfusion(blood) can be relatively accurately diagnosed with brain.

Medical treatment of acute he/she is difficult to determine whether to remove the blood species through an operation, in principle, or by surgery. Whether to perform an operation like the blood transfusion within the two other external surgery, is determined by considering the patient's level of consciousness, age, whether to be accompanied by the blood species in brain CT, the patient's overall condition, etc.

In a case where there is no sign of increase in the two types of blood species less and there is no signs of increase in the internal pressure, the progress may be seen to be observed in detail, and the periodic CT photography is helpful.If there is no big change in the preservation treatment, if the quantity of the blood species continues to be treated, but if there is a increase in the quantity of the blood species or a change in the neological state, it is necessary to take into account the surgeryal treatment, i.e., if the quantity of the blood species is large and the neological state is poor.

The method of operation has a astronomical marism, dogbal marism, pressure tensions, etc., and when there are a large amount of blood species, it is necessary to implement the marbal marism as much as possible.

(C) Towing; and

However, even if treatment is performed in any way, the death rate is at least 50% in most cases, and even if the person is alive, serious residual disability remains. In the past, young children with the age, the awareness of the operation is good, and the accompanying brain damage is considerably involved after the towing. In addition, it is known that the operation is more likely to be performed at the early stage after the occurrence of the two parts.

(2) Live-to-becopa free from credit;

(A) Summary.

In the case of cerebrovascular transfusion, which is the most commonly observed 39% of the patients suffering from severe cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Sphere, but the actual frequency of occurrence is presumed to be more shade) the cerebral cerebral cerebral cerebral Sphere is mainly caused by damage to small chere that is the lower under the cerebral cerebral cerebral Sphere. Although clinical meaning is not significant, a large quantity of maths generated from the floor of the cerebral cerebral Sphere, resulting in damage itself, which is inferior. However, it is known that it may result in subsequent cerebral cerebral Sphere or matha, but most cases arise from the atmosphere of the half.

(b) Diagnosis and treatment;

The cerebrovascular is easily diagnosed with brain, and there seems to be a difference between the cerebral cerebral typhism and CT typhism.As the cerebral typhism may occur due to the cerebral typhism which is similar to the cerebral typhism, it is necessary to cope with it, and the time of occurrence of the cerebral typhism is similar to the cerebral typhism, and there is a difference between the time of occurrence of the cerebral typhism and the time of occurrence of the cerebral typhism, and the throphal typhism is different from the time of completion of the throphal typhism, and the throphal typhal typhism is destroyed after 3 weeks.

[Reasons for Recognition]: A without dispute, entry of Gap 1 through 7, 10 evidence, and the Korean Medical Association of this Court

The result of the entrustment of appraisal of medical records and the result of the entrustment of supplementation of appraisal, the purport of the whole pleadings;

A. The assertion

(1) The plaintiffs

A. The brain thire description of the deceased, taken by the hospital A, did not have a string line. On July 23, 2014, 200:20, after the transfer to the Defendant hospital, the brain thire description had continuously increased the blood volume by continuously increasing the number of thire, such as 4mm in the string line. As such, the Defendant hospital was negligent in failing to conduct an emergency stale, although it had been found that the Defendant hospital had been responsible for conducting an emergency stale, and ②, in other cases, to observe the progress through a preserved treatment, rather than an immediate operation, the need for an emergency thalethic surgery was determined through additional thalethic examination (GCS) and brain stalthic examination (GCS), and the Defendant hospital did not neglect 45 minutes until the date the whole was actually performed, and even if the deceased was negligent by failing to comply with the Defendant’s duty of care due to the Plaintiff’s negligence and failure to notify the deceased’s medical status of the deceased.

(2) Defendant

① According to the records of brain cT photographing at the time of the establishment of the Defendant hospital, the deceased was not in a state of need for immediate emergency operation, such as not exceeding 5mm in a fixed line. ② The Defendant hospital was hospitalized in the emergency center area A of the Defendant hospital due to the cause of a reclimatic therapy, continuously observe virative surgery and the state of consciousness, and administer a bropology, tri-bropic urology, anti-bropic agents, disguised protective agents, and liver protective agents. At the time of the transfer, the deceased was inevitably transferred to the Defendant hospital for reasons such as the absence of time to the patient room. As such, the Plaintiff’s assertion that the deceased was neglected to undergo medical treatment by continuously administering Tropic Acid (the drugs used to prevent dropic transfusion) until the transfer was made, and there was no possibility of the Plaintiff hospital’s bropic urine increase in the patient’s condition at the time of the transfer to the hospital.

B. Determination

(1) Relevant legal principles

In general, in order to be held liable for tort due to breach of the duty of care in medical practice or due to nonperformance of the duty of care should be premised on the existence of causal link between a violation of the duty of care in medical practice, a loss and a violation of the duty of care, and an occurrence of a loss. This is an area where only a patient asserts this issue requires highly professional knowledge. The process of the medical treatment is limited to only the patient himself/herself if he/she knows part of it, and the medical method to achieve the determination of treatment depends on his/her own discretion. As such, it is difficult for the patient to prove whether the direct cause of the loss occurred due to medical negligence as an ordinary person who is not an expert, and it is extremely difficult for the patient to medically prove the causal link between the occurrence of a doctor’s breach of the duty of care in medical practice and the occurrence of a loss, and it is extremely unreasonable for the patient to prove the causal link between the result of the medical treatment and the result of the medical treatment at least nine different from that of the medical treatment at least nine different from that of the general public.

(2) Determination as to the existence of negligence in medical treatment

(A) whether there is negligence in the absence of an emergency operation;

The defendant hospital confirmed that the deceased had an external shocking satise, such as measuring the satise level of 4mm on July 22, 2014 at around 00:20 on the following day through brain-TT taken by the deceased on July 22, 2014. However, the above facts did not immediately take emergency satise, but transferred to the hospital 01:40 B on the following day without taking measures such as an emergency satise. However, according to the above evidence, it is necessary to verify whether the deceased was under the influence of alcohol and the satise of satise of satise of satise at the time, or not due to satise damage. ② Even if the satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise.

(B) Whether the person was negligent in the course of the power supply and the power supply.

1) Whether the decision on the discharge of power resources itself was based on negligence

Around 00:53 on July 23, 2014, the Defendant hospital determined that the deceased should be transferred to B hospital on the grounds that there was no time for the patient room, etc., and transferred the deceased to B hospital on the same day. As seen earlier, the Defendant hospital, a large university hospital, had human and physical facilities that make it easy to diagnose and perform emergency operations on the deceased than B hospital that was transferred to the deceased, so continuous observation of the state is desirable rather than that of all. However, if it is difficult for the Defendant hospital to provide appropriate emergency medical services on the deceased because it accommodates more than the deceased, it is difficult to deem that the Plaintiff was erroneous for the Defendant hospital to transfer the deceased to another hospital (the Defendant’s assertion that 14 out of 15 patient beds from the 15th time the Deceased was born to the Defendant hospital, and was in an emergency drinking, and that there was no reason to view the change in the condition of the deceased’s surgery on July 23, 2014.)

2) Whether the actions against the Deceased were negligent after the power resource was determined

According to the evidence, such as the above, if the defendant hospital actually conducted an emergency treatment of the deceased on July 23, 2014, by 00:53, and from the same day to 01:40, it is recognized that it had continuously provided oxygen to the deceased, while measuring the depth and oxygen level of the deceased on the deceased, and continuously supplying the deceased. On the other hand, on July 23, 2014, the deceased was found to have been unable to undergo an emergency treatment of the deceased on the date when he/she conducted an emergency treatment of the deceased on the date when he/she conducted an emergency treatment of the deceased, and it was necessary to undergo an emergency treatment of the deceased on the date when he/she conducted an emergency treatment of the deceased on the date when he/she conducted an emergency treatment. Thus, even if the defendant hospital decided to transfer the deceased, it is difficult to view that there was a possibility that it would be an emergency treatment of the deceased, such as an emergency treatment of the deceased on the date he/she conducted an emergency treatment of the deceased on the date he/she performed the surgery.

3) Whether the person was negligent in the course of the entire process of the hospital B

A) A physician who transfers an emergency patient shall provide the patient with information necessary for the treatment of the patient, such as the patient’s major symptoms and signs, the result and basic diagnosis name of the examination conducted, the details of the executed first aid, the patient’s condition before and after the first aid, the patient’s condition, all necessary emergency inspections and first aid, and the degree of urgency, within a reasonable scope so that the patient can take first aid in a timely manner (see Supreme Court Decision 2009Do7070, Apr. 29, 2010). In particular, in a case where the patient is in a situation where the patient needs to undergo a prompt emergency operation, the patient has a duty of care to transfer the patient after checking whether it is possible to undergo a prompt emergency operation (see Supreme Court Decision 2005Da16713, Jun. 24, 2005).

B) Although Defendant 2 recommended that the deceased would be transferred to C or D hospital, the guardian of the deceased, the deceased, to the extent that it would be difficult for the deceased to conduct an emergency operation. However, as seen earlier, the death room that the deceased would have been transferred to B or D was recognized by the foregoing evidence, i.e., the number of blood ties increased due to an emergency operation, and that it would have been sufficiently anticipated that the present condition of the deceased could occur as a result of the Defendant hospital’s 4 medical treatment because it was difficult for the deceased to conduct an emergency operation at the time when the hospital was transferred to B or 40 minutes of time as the time of all determination and the time of the transfer to B or 45 minutes of time, it appears that there was a possibility that the patient would have been an emergency operation immediately aggravated after the transfer of the deceased to B or 20 minutes of time, and that there was no possibility that the patient would have been an emergency operation again at the time of the transfer to B or 40 minutes of time after the operation.

(3) Determination as to whether causation is recognized

As above, the Defendant hospital was negligent by failing to perform its duty of care in the process of transferring the deceased to B hospital, and by failing to perform its duty of care in the process of transferring the deceased to B hospital. At around 02:49 on July 23, 2014, the deceased transferred the deceased to the Defendant hospital again at the Defendant hospital. At that time, the deceased had already been in an emergency opening, but did not undergo an operation at a high level of risk that the deceased could not be able to undergo an emergency opening, and died from brain pressure due to brain side and external cerebrovascular, at around 17:47 on the same day. At the time of death, the deceased was dead at the time of death, and even according to the result of the court’s entrustment of medical records to the Medical Association of the Medical Doctors of this Court, considering that there was a causal probability between the deceased’s negligence and the deceased’s death on the part of the deceased, it is reasonable to deem that there was a causal relationship between the deceased’s negligence in the medical treatment of the deceased.

C. Sub-committee

Therefore, the defendant is an employer who is responsible for paying damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the above negligence of the defendant hospital.

D. Limitation on liability

The Defendant’s liability is limited to 50% of the amount of damages in consideration of the following: (a) the medical act is essentially a physical violation; and (b) the medical act is a highly dangerous act that does not avoid expected other results even if all cares are provided; (c) the Defendant’s hospital proposed a D hospital or C hospital that is capable of an emergency operation as a hospital to be transferred; (d) the Plaintiff ○○ ① requested all of the hospitals; (d) it was difficult for the Deceased to clearly grasp the state of consciousness while under the influence of alcohol; and (e) there was a smoking career for the Deceased.

3. Scope of damages.

The basis of calculation, expenditure, calculation, and amount of the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs are as follows: (a) the computation shall be calculated on the basis of the date of death (as of July 23, 2014) according to the simple discount method which deducts intermediary interest at the rate of 5/12% per month (as of July 23, 2014).

(a) Actual profits;

(i) the facts of recognition and evaluation;

Gender: male.

Date of birth: July 8, 1964

Income: Daily daily wage for urban daily workers;

Maximum working age: From July 23, 2014, which is the date of the instant accident, to July 7, 2024, when the maximum working age reaches 60 years of age.

Cost of living: 1/3 of the amount of income;

[Reasons for Recognition]: Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1, 8, 9, 11 (including each number), this Court

and the purport of the whole pleading.

(ii)Calculation;

11. 201 - 7. 23 - 23 2. 4 - 8 - 3 4 - 4 - 4 - 2 9 - 3 4 - 4 - 4 6 - 3 5 - 3 9 - 4 6 - 3 5 - 4 9 - 4 6 - 3 9 4 - 4 6 - 3 1 - 4 9 6 - 4 5 - 3 9 6 - 4 9 6 - 3 9 6 - 4 1 6 4 - 3 5 9 6 - 4 9 6 1, 266 , 2014 - 2015 - 9 2015 - 30 8 5 9 - 19 5 2015 - 204

(b) Funeral expenses: Three thousand won.

C. Limitation on liability

1) The defendant's liability ratio: 50%

2) The deceased’s lost income: 70,579,123 won (=141, 158,246 won x 50%)

3) Funeral expenses of the Plaintiff Cho ○○○: KRW 1,500,000 (=3,000,000 x 50%)

(d) Condolence money;

1) Reasons for consideration: The deceased’s age, family relation, the background and result of the occurrence of the instant accident, and other various circumstances shown in the pleadings of the instant case.

2) Amount of consolation money

Deceased 40,000,000 won, Plaintiff 0-10,000,000 won, Plaintiff 2,000,000 won, Plaintiff 3,000,000 won, respectively.

(e) Inheritance;

1) The deceased’s claim: 110,579,123 won (=the deceased’s lost income of KRW 70,579,123 + the consolation money of KRW 40,000,000)

2) Inheritance amount

A) Plaintiff ○○○○ 36,859,707 won (=10,579,123 won 】 statutory inheritance portion 3/9, but less than KRW 3/9,000)

B) Plaintiff 10,573,138 Won 24,573,138 (=10,579,123 x statutory inheritance 2/9)

F. Amount for the claimant by plaintiff

1) Plaintiff ○○○○○ KRW 48,359,707 (i.e., inheritance amount of KRW 36,859,707 + Funeral expenses of KRW 1,500,000 + 10,000,000)

2) Plaintiff HOB, Ma○○, and Ma○○○○, respectively, KRW 27,573,138 (=Inheritance amounting to KRW 24,573,138 + 3,00,000)

G. Sub-committee

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff ○○○(s) KRW 48,359,707, plaintiff 100, KRW 15% per annum under the Civil Act until July 14, 2017, which is the date of the instant judgment, to the plaintiff ○○○(s) and KRW 27,573,138, each of which is 27,573,138, and each of which is 15% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the date of full payment.

Therefore, the plaintiffs' claims are accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as they are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Kim Jong-chul (Presiding Judge)

Freeboards

Relocation Decree

1) Glasgow Commona Scale (hereinafter referred to as “GCS”) are each half from three parts of eye oping, beng verbal repon, bengr repon.

It means the way to confirm the response value and to evaluate the degree of increase in food disability by summing up it. GCS 7 points,

If it exceeds nine points, it shall be excluded from the number of mixed points. The degree of gravity of credit may be divided according to the GCS scores, while GCS 3 to 8 points are severe trauma;

GCS 9-12 Points 13 to 15 points in middle and middle and middle and high level, and 1,000 patients are classified into GCS in the early stages of credit and posture for 1,000 patients.

As a result of tracking the relationship, 97% of the patients with 3 to 4 points of GCR were in a sustainable plant condition or died, and 25% of the patients with 8 points of GCR

There is a report that the plant condition is or died, and 61% of them have better recovery or disability in the middle class.

2) For the components of Glasgow Commona Scale on top of medical records (Evidence A5), eye 2, beng 3, beng 3, beng.

Tr respon 4, which consists of 9 points in total, but eye oping - no eye oping should be evaluated as 1, and so, arms.

The entry of the register appears to be a clerical error. The defendant's foregoing number is evaluated by the training that was on duty in the emergency room at the time of the emergency, and is determined by the price of the nelimatic department.

The detailed evaluation of this case argues that "e - topain, v - Barun, m - Localize, in numericalization of these contents, 11.

It is difficult to confirm the documents submitted in the litigation through the records of emergency patients (the records of the emergency patient hospital and the records of nursing).

No. NS ERE’s closure screen on April 5, 2017, only written out in the preparatory documents dated April 5, 2017, and such material as evidence or reference material.

In this form, the court did not submit it to this court.

3) Spanma is one of the brakings. Propa-matho transfusion is the old term of satho-mathma, and the instant medical record and the result of the appraisal commission.

Since a large number of 's blood transfusion' is used, the following is followed.

4) On July 23, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 01:40, the time of transfer on July 23, 2014, ascertaining that the nurse of the Defendant hospital was active before the Deceased (the blood pressure of 120/80mhg, the body temperature of 36.0mHg, and beer and beer.

76 / Parts, 20 / 00 / 00 /), however, the documents submitted in the instant lawsuit (the records of the emergency patient in the Defendant hospital and the records of nursing) have been submitted.

It is difficult to confirm this (the Defendant’s computerized input of the above nurse’s on the screen of the nursing or the nursing service program screen.)

Moreover, on September 21, 2016, the Defendant only stated in the preparatory document that he measured on April 5, 2017 nurses, and that he measured on April 5, 2017, and there was a document showing activeness, and there was a document showing the same time data as the hospital and the hospital, or a document showing active strength and reference data somewhat different between the two forms.

the blood pressure, physical temperature, and respiratory water are the same. From 1:40 to 12 minutes after the 12-minutes, the blood pressure and beer water is rapidly reduced.

As the defendant's assertion has increased, there is a question as to whether the nurse of the defendant hospital properly measured the vitality at around 1:40.

There are also circumstances.

5) eye oping 1,balon verbalon verbalon 1

6) In case of damage to both parts, it is understood that clinical medicine and blood species are the same in the same sense.

7) The area where the patient with the highest symptoms is hospitalized in the emergency room of the Defendant Hospital.

8) The defendant hospital did not have any record that the defendant hospital confirmed the change of consciousness, the co-ordinity, and the co-ordinity, or that it conducted the GCR inspection, and as mentioned earlier.

It is difficult to see that the hospital properly confirmed the active symptoms of the Deceased at around 01:40.

(ix) Article 11 (Transfer of Emergency Patients) of the Emergency Medical Service Act;

(1) Where medical personnel deem that an emergency patient is unable to provide appropriate emergency medical services in the capacity of the relevant medical institution, they shall, without delay, do so.

Patients shall be transferred to another medical institution where appropriate emergency medical services are available.

(2) The head of a medical institution shall provide medical instruments and human resources necessary for the safe transfer of an emergency patient when transferring an emergency patient under paragraph (1).

and shall provide the medical records necessary for the examination and treatment to the medical institution to which the emergency patient is transferred.