Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On July 2019, the Defendant: (a) heard from the singinging employee of the name singinging employee the phrase “to create the details of the deposit from the account used by the law because of a low credit rating so that the loan is likely to enter into the account; (b) to enter money into the said account; and (c) to obtain the loan; and (c) to provide the B bank account (C) in the name of the Defendant with the name of the above singing employee; and (d) to facilitate his fraud by providing the said singing employee with the name singinginging employee.

On July 25, 2019, the name-freeistist entered into an account in which the victim D calls to “E employee, if he/she pays the existing loan, he/she will deposit at a low interest rate to the account informing him/her that it would be possible to refund the loan.” Accordingly, the victim should transfer the above amount of KRW 15 million to the above B Bank account. The defendant withdraws the above amount of KRW 15 million in cash at the order of the above name-freeist, and then sent it to another trillion won who sent the name-freeist person at the point of B Bank's mountain station at around 15:30 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant made it easy to commit the fraud of a person who has not received his name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Certificates of payment of damages;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on response to financial transaction information (AB bank account in its name);

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Articles 347 (1) and 32 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 32(2) and 55(1)6 of the Criminal Act for aiding and abetting and mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is a crime aiding and abetting and abetting the singishing crime by withdrawing the amount of singishing damage deposited into the account under one’s name in cash and delivering it to the cash collection book, and the crime is not less complicated in light of the circumstances and contents of the crime.

However, this case.