beta
Text
1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. 1) Status of the parties to the case
(2) The Plaintiff is an owner of the instant land, who acquired the ownership of the existing school site and teacher located on the land located in Dobong-dong 278, Youngdong-dong 278 and newly built a new school building on the land located in the Gu-si and 54 and 3 lots. (2) On December 6, 2011 and April 29, 2013, the Plaintiff is the owner of the instant land, who acquired the ownership of the land located in the Gu-si 54-1 forest and 33,058 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”), located in the Gu-si-dong 54-1 forest and 54,813 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) from the sale and purchase of the instant land, which is part of the school site subject to the transfer of the Gu-si private teaching institute.
3) The Defendant is the supervisory body for the project to relocate school facilities. B. On September 9, 2009, the dispute over the construction of new school buildings and the litigation related thereto were approved by the Defendant pursuant to Article 4(1) of the School Facilities Projects Promotion Act and Article 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, and on February 17, 2010, the Defendant applied for approval for construction of school facilities from the Defendant on March 12, 2010, and was subject to the approval pursuant to Article 5-2(1) of the School Facilities Projects Promotion Act and Article 9(2) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act.
2) On September 28, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the construction of a school building (Tgu District Court 201Gahap10052) and received a favorable judgment on October 22, 2013 against the construction of a school building that constructed the instant school building on September 28, 2012. According to the above provisional execution sentence, the construction of a new school building was executed by Dadong Co., Ltd., Ltd., and the construction was interrupted due to the payment of the price for the construction of the building at issue. (3) The Plaintiff was sentenced to a favorable judgment on October 22, 2013. The remainder of the building except for the high school building among the school buildings.