The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant did not commit an indecent act against the victim as stated in the facts charged.

B. The punishment of the lower court is heavy.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence examined in the lower court’s argument of mistake of facts, the following facts and circumstances are recognized.

The facts that the defendant commits an indecent act against the victim may be recognized based on such facts.

1) The victim consistently stated in the investigative agency and the court of the court below that “the Defendant’s right tacks the left part with the left part of two to three seconds.”

The victim sent D’s message to Ma, “her her her her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or her m or herm

The report was filed.

It is difficult to find out the reason why the victim, who had been working as a friendship and a place of promise late at night, can gather the defendant as a sexual indecent act.

The statements of the victim may be trusted.

2) At the Defendant India investigative agency, “the head of the agency was the same.”

This decision has been repeated.

The phrase “booming that there was a physical contact with the victim” was partially acknowledged (Evidence No. 13 No. 64 of the Evidence List No. 13). The Defendant asserts that booming expenses are merely physical contacts that were inevitable or in an influent manner within the entire boom, and that it does not intentionally interfere with the victim’s conduct.

However, the victim said, in the investigative agency, “the Defendant was tamper about 2 to 3 seconds of her her son who was left in the left hand, and the Defendant was licked by her her son because her son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’

other than the Corporation.