A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is the representative of the landscaped company, which is a landscaped company.

Although the Defendant intended to participate in the tender for the selection of the company for landscaping construction in the Suwon-si D Apartment Zone D, it was impossible to issue a tax payment certificate due to the existence of the amount of national taxes in arrears, and it was stored on the computer screen on the website of the National Tax Service (Internet).

On April 15, 2015, the new Gwangju Tax Office issued a tax payment certificate under the name of the head of the new Gwangju Tax Office and the period of validity changed to forge the tax payment certificate.

On February 5, 2016, the Defendant had been stored on the computer-based screen in order to exercise in the office of a dispute settlement center in Gwangju-si E around February 5, 2016

On April 15, 2015, opening a file of a tax payment certificate under the name of the head of the new Gwangju Tax Office and stated the “Effective Period” column as the “Effective Period” column and “date of issuance” on February 28, 2016.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged a tax payment certificate under the name of the head of the new tax office in Gwangju, which is an official document.

2. On February 5, 2016, the Defendant presented a false public document certificate of tax payment, which is a forged public document, to an employee of the name-free management office, who is aware of the fact, at the Management Office of Apartment-si (U.S.) around the same day, and exercised it as if it were duly prepared.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 25 of the Official Document) and Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of uttering of forged official document);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1)

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;