logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.10.26 2018고정486
도로교통법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. When intending to change course of a motor vehicle running in the direction to which he/she intends to change, if there is a concern over impeding the normal traffic of other motor vehicles, he/she shall not change course, and he/she shall not make a sudden operation, such as making a sudden stop of the motor vehicle in the direction to which he/she intends to change his/her route or reducing the speed of the motor vehicle, except in cases of preventing dangers and in other unavoidable circumstances, and when he/she drives another motor vehicle on an expressway, he/she shall safely drive the motor vehicle along the left side of the motor vehicle by using a direction gauge, light or horn;

Nevertheless, at around 01:50 on November 20, 2017, the Defendant driven a CST7 car and proceeded to an expressway near the E StM7 car located in Yong-do, Gyeonggi-do, to the Seoul direction. During the process of running a so-called “folish driving” mutually so-called “folishing driving,” due to the Defendant’s passing of the FFG car to the GGGGK car, he was driven by the Seoul direction, without using the direction device immediately before the said car, and then rapidly changed the course, or reduce the sudden speed, and ② the Defendant repeated the act of overtaking the vehicle to the right side without using the direction device, etc. for other vehicles.

As a result, the Defendant committed a violation of the prohibition of change of course under the Road Traffic Act, a violation of the prohibition of rapid driving, or a violation of the method of passing ahead of an expressway, or a violation of one act may threaten or endanger others or cause danger to traffic continuously or repeatedly.

2. The Defendant B, at the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, had the instant G, other than the instant case, drive the said FFF FFGGG car, and the Defendant was passing the instant G G while driving the said FFGG car, as described in paragraph 1 of the Victim A (40C).

arrow