Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim C (V, 19 years old), who was an employee, to enter the floor under the influence of alcohol at the convenience store located in the south of the city of Busan on January 10, 2016; and (b) requested the victim C (V, 19 years old) to “I change the call taxi”; and (c) from the husband and wife under the witness name of the witness, there are many other taxies.

I would like to hear the word “,” and “I am to see, N am, I am to see the word.”

Along to about 20 minutes, the victim’s sale of goods was hindered by force, such as bringing a bath to “h.”.

2. The Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties was sent to the police station of the Busan Young-do Police Station, after receiving 112 reports due to the same act as described in paragraph 1, and “this rings. Since the test made by Nar to the police station of the Busan Young-do Police Station.”

Den Doz.;

D. D. C. S. S. S. L. S. L. S. L. S. L. S.C.

On January 10, 2017, at around 22:18, Busan Young-do Police Station D (F), arrested a flagrant offender at the Busan Young-gu Police Station Down-gu, Busan, while performing the bath of “Ari-gu,” etc., “Ari-gu is more happy to a prison where Ari-gu is flacul.”

no name may be given.

The police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning prevention and investigation of crime was hindered by assaulting E face and spawn with hot coffees cited by his hand, such as spawning into E face and spawn.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (victim C party telephone investigation);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties), and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is to have the history of criminal punishment three times for violent crimes.