beta
Text
1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
purport, purport, and.
Reasons
1. The court's explanation concerning the instant case is based on the reasoning that the instant case should be cited by the court of first instance, 1-2, 1-2.
Paragraph 6 " February 4, 2011" shall be construed as " February 24, 201," and 2 Myeon 1-b.
The contents on wages in the conduct of Paragraph 7 are as follows: “The rate of increase in public officials’ wages shall apply to street cleaners cleaning workers in mining areas; specific personnel expenses shall be paid in accordance with the salary table; ③ The basic salary of street cleaners in mining areas shall be in accordance with the wage table; and the other allowances, etc. shall be in accordance with the provisions on public officials’ allowances, etc. applicable mutatis mutandis; ④ The 470,250 won paid by Plaintiff B in December 201 shall be in accordance with the statement of No. 3-3, and the number of allowances paid by Plaintiff E from September 201 to December 2011 shall be in accordance with the statement of No. 3-2, No. 2010 to the extent that Plaintiff E’s allowance paid from September 201 to December 201 shall be in accordance with the statement of No. 3-2 and No. 3-4, 201 to the extent that Plaintiff E’s first wage is in excess of KRW 470,250 to December 214, 2018.
2. The phrase “H part see” is as follows: 5. The phrase “days work allowances” is added to the phrase “days work allowances” of the 9th page 9, and the phrase “Plaintiffs (excluding Plaintiff A) claimed holiday work allowances by calculating working hours per day on a holiday of 7 hours, and the claim was accepted in its entirety)” is the same as the judgment of the first instance court, except that the Defendant states below on the matters asserted in the trial. Thus, it is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Additional matters to be determined;
A. The defendant's assertion is that the time allowances, etc. are paid according to the standards set forth in the collective agreement concluded between the labor union of this case and the mine office.