The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

The application for compensation order of this case shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2012, the Defendant: (a) operated by the victim C in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu; (b) operated by the victim C in the name of F, the victim, using the gap of the place due to overseas business trip, was stolen by driving a vehicle with a vehicle with a G cream equivalent to KRW 70 million registered in the name of F, which was managed by the victim.

2. On August 2012, 2012, the Defendant: (a) driven an I Haki vehicle with a market value equivalent to KRW 20 million registered in the name of H, a victim, who was established at the same place in the same manner as a patrol officer, and stolen it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness J, K, C, or L;

1. A copy of the complaint, a copy of content certificate, and a copy of the contract;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. A fine of three million won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 94Do2076, Oct. 12, 1995; 90Do1021, Sept. 11, 1990; 200Do1021, Sept. 11, 1990) of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 94Do2076, Oct. 12, 1995; 200Do1021, Sept. 11, 1990; 2000Do14448, Feb. 23, 2008; 2000Do13338, Feb. 28, 2007).