logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2020.10.26 2020고단4243
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 15, 2020, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of execution of official duties in Seoul Southern District Court for the purpose of obstruction of performance of official duties, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 23, 2020 and is currently in the grace period.

On July 22, 2020, at around 21:35, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in front of Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul; (b) the Police Officer D, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station C District District, was dispatched to the site and recommended to the effect that “on his house for early use,” and “on his house for early use,” after receiving 112 reports; and (c) the Defendant marged to the effect that “I do not leave. I do not leave.” The Defendant mard the city expenses, “I do not leave. I do not leave.” The Defendant mard the front left head of the above latitude with a hand-on one time, thereby hindering the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the handling of the 112 Report Report of the InspectorD.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Video CDs, including a 112 reported case processing table;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (Attachment to the same type of judgment, etc.);

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the relevant criminal facts, Article 136(1) of the choice of punishment, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(2) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties,

It is inevitable to sentence a sentence on a defendant even if it is considered that a criminal who has committed any contingent crime and that the defendant reflects his/her dignity.

In addition, the sentence identical to the order shall be imposed in consideration of the age, career, character and conduct, family relationship, etc. of the defendant and the conditions of the sentencing revealed in the course of trial.

arrow