logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.09.02 2015구합81003
산업재해보상보험 사업종류변경 거부처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, at the head office located in the Gisung-si petition, manufactures strawers for vehicles (electric vehicles to be supplied to hybrid vehicles), strawers for vehicles, and studio ioners for vehicle clusters, respectively, at the branch office located in Asan-si, and manufactures straw-type products, etc., respectively. The head office (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s place of business”) was subject to industrial accident compensation insurance (hereinafter “industrial accident insurance”) from October 22, 1997 to “other kinds of manufacturing businesses (hereinafter “industrial accident insurance”)” (hereinafter “industrial accident insurance”) (the industrial accident insurance premium rate of 30/1,000).

B. On September 24, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for the change of the type of industrial accident insurance business with the Plaintiff’s workplace to “Plastic Product Manufacturing (20910)” (the industrial accident insurance premium rate of 17/1,000). However, on November 20, 2014, the Defendant rejected the said application by the following reasons.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). In a report on changes in the insurance relationship for the first time at your company, it is not reasonable to apply the industrial accident insurance type to plastic products manufacturing business (20910) as a result of the fact-finding survey of the workplace, but it is not reasonable to apply it to the plastic products manufacturing business. First of all, we discussed the application of the automobile parts manufacturing business (22708) that are deemed to meet the current status of the workplace.

After checking the actual condition of Egypt's workplace, the Dong did not process the entire vehicle Egypter, but added work process only to the part of Egypter, which is a part of Egypter for vehicles, without any additional process, and confirmed the fact that Egypt's raw materials are fibers.

According to the criteria for determining types of business for exclusive motor vehicle parts, even if the relevant motor vehicle parts are classified as “business of manufacturing machinery and equipment for transportation”, they shall be classified as “made fibres.”

arrow