Defendant

B Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and for four months, each of the defendants A shall be punished by imprisonment.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On October 18, 2007, at the Seo-gu District Court Branch Branch Branch of the Daegu District Court, a suspended sentence of three years on October 26, 2007 was sentenced to imprisonment for fraud, etc., and the said judgment was finalized on October 26, 2007.

The Defendant committed the fraud of the Defendant for the 1st century, even though he was not authorized by the reconstruction and improvement cooperative to conclude a contract for the removal of existing apartment units, etc. for the reconstruction project due to the lack of intent or ability to conclude a contract for the said removal work, the said removal work is the contract cycle for the said removal work, and the F was delivered KRW 50 million from the F as the contract deposit, but the said money was placed at the F’s request in the situation where the F would return the said money.

On January 2007, the Defendant, at a restaurant where it is impossible to know the trade name located in the Nam-gu Daegu-dong, Daegu-dong, the Defendant: (a) the victim G and B, “In the Republic of Korea, the Defendant received the removal work from the head of the said reconstruction and improvement cooperative for the total of KRW 72,727 square meters of apartment space ( approximately KRW 22,000 square meters) at KRW 2,64,000,000,000 from the head of the said reconstruction and improvement cooperative; (b) made a construction subcontract at the same amount; and (c) received a down payment of KRW 50,000,000,000,000 from the F that he renounces the construction work; and (d) made a false statement to the said removal work.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have the right to enter into the above contract for the above removal works, as well as the above removal works had the right to enter into the above removal works by entering into a subcontract with Daewoo Construction Co., Ltd. with H around January 27, 2006.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victims, received KRW 1,00,00 from tin to the account under the name of the Defendant on January 30, 2007, and received KRW 5,00,000 from around February 7, 2007, and received KRW 15,00,000 from the above account on February 12, 2007, and received KRW 31,00,000 from the above account.