A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Despite the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times by destroying and damaging property, assault, insult, etc. at the D cafeteria operated by the Victim C, the Defendant, in the racing-si.

1. On September 30, 2013, at around 08:00 on September 30, 2013, customers find the said D cafeteria and interfere with the victim’s restaurant business by force, such as: (a) “I have been frighten, frighten, and frighten; (b) I have been frighten; and (c) I have been frighten.”

2. At around 11:10 on the same day, a victim’s restaurant business was obstructed by force, such as: (a) the victim and her husband E, who want to enter the said restaurant; (b) the victim and her husband E; (c) the entrance was skeed; and (d) the 10 minutes of the entrance, such as the booming of the entrance; and (c) the booming of the e-mail, etc.; and (d) the customers were unable to enter the restaurant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes under relevant Articles of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the damage is relatively minor, the fact that there is no previous conviction from a fine, the fact that the damage is reflectd, the age of the defendant

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;