beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. The defendant B shall list the attached real estate list
1. To deliver the recorded real property:
B. Defendant C is the same list.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is a housing redevelopment project partnership which was established for the purpose of housing redevelopment project with the area of project implementation consisting of 22,489 square meters and 222,489 square meters in Suwon-si as prescribed by the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents and the articles of incorporation, and has obtained authorization to establish an association from the Suwon City on December 17,
B. On June 29, 2016, the Plaintiff received project implementation authorization from the water supply market, and was publicly notified on August 25, 2017 of the approval plan for the management and disposal of the water supply market (U.S. E).
C. Each real estate listed in the separate sheet is located within the project implementation district, and the Defendants have occupied each of the above real estate as the owner or tenant of each of the pertinent real estate listed in the separate sheet of real estate.
After receiving the ruling of expropriation from the local Land Tribunal of Gyeonggi-do, the Plaintiff deposited the full amount of compensation for losses under the above ruling of expropriation.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 through 4, 6 evidence, Gap 5-1, 2, Gap 7-1, 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The Defendants are obligated to deliver each of the relevant real estate listed in the separate sheet of real estate owned by the Defendants to the Plaintiff who acquired the right to use and benefit in accordance with the notice of the management
Until the defendant B is paid compensation as a cash liquidation, the list of the attached real estate.
1. Although the plaintiff alleged that he did not have a duty to deliver the mentioned real estate, as seen above, the plaintiff deposited the compensation for losses to the above defendant, and thus the above assertion is not accepted.
3. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is accepted.