logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.02.16 2015고단4457
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and for one year, respectively.

However, between two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants B raised salt, pigs, etc. in the middle-west Gyeong-gun Lane in the case of the victim K. The defendants B raised salt, pigs, etc.

On March 12, 2013, the Defendants found N Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “N”)’s O-P calls at the construction site of the transmission line steel tower between U-P and Defendant B, the site manager, and Defendant B, “EA fleded due to the construction of the transmission tower, which differs from its historical value.” Defendant A, who, “The transmission line passes through her father’s land, is not good for scenic view, and is going to the surrounding environment.”

all the Corporation may not take place towards the environment.

“In doing so, the Defendants received money from each of the agricultural cooperatives accounts in the name of the Defendants, each of which was transferred to the Defendants, from the victims of frightage, as if they were to file a civil petition, without paying compensation, and the amount of KRW 6 million, around March 14, 2013, from the victims of frightage.

2. Defendant B, as in the above paragraph (1), did not provide a 6 million won tree from the victim K to the Defendant, and thereafter filed a civil petition with the Korea Power Corporation, which is the supervisory agency of the steel tower, from August 28, 2013. Around March 17, 2014, Defendant B continued to file a civil petition in cases where the victim K did not pay 10 million won under the pretext of agreement with the victim K at the construction site.

Around March 21, 2014, the 10 million won was transferred to the agricultural bank account in the name of the defendant from the person who was frighted to fright and frighted to frighten.

3. As Defendant B’s fraud worked as an employee of Q Q Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ Q”) from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013, Defendant B prepared a labor contract and prepared a document as if Defendant B had worked in Q Q’s workplace upon the expiration of the period of the labor contract, which was accepted as the salary of approximately KRW 2.3 million each month, and prepared a document as if Defendant B had worked in Q Q’s workplace and had been unemployed.

arrow