logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.07.17 2017나111404
소유권이전등기말소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal and the plaintiff's claim expanded by this court are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

Reasons

The grounds for this part of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this part are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the amended part under paragraph (2) below. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

The portion of the first instance court’s amendment is 13/65 (“2/13” as “(i.e., 10/65) directly inherited from the deceased C, and (ii) the portion of “2/13” as “3/65 of the deceased C’s wife D.”

The testimony of the witness F shall be revised to “each testimony of the witness F” of the 3th 11th and 4th 2th 2th ...

4. The part of "Witness F" in the 21st parallel shall be modified to "F of the first instance trial witness."

5. The portion of “G” in two pages shall be modified to “this Court Witness G.”

In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim, including the claim extended by this court, shall be dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is justified as to the claim prior to the extension by this court. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the plaintiff's claim expanded by this court is also dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow