logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.11.23 2017가합101752
양수금
Text

1. The defendant shall pay 208,685,810 won to the plaintiff.

2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.

3. Of the costs of lawsuit.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On April 30, 2009, the Defendant entered into a contract for the sale of the apartment at KRW 941,900,000 of the total sale price (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) with the building company for petition and the Daeyang Industrial Development Co., Ltd. (the supply agent is the brick Construction Co., Ltd., Ltd.) for the purpose of selling the apartment at KRW 309,501 (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

B. On May 25, 2009, the Defendant concluded a loan transaction agreement with a new bank (hereinafter “new bank”) in order to prepare part payments pursuant to the instant sales contract, as follows:

(hereinafter referred to as "the loan agreement of this case". The loan section: (a) the transaction classification of intermediate payment loans related to general financing loans: Limit transaction amount: 376,760,00 won loan commencement date: June 22, 2009: The loan interest rate of February 28, 201: the floating interest rate of February 28, 201: 16% per annum, adding the interest rate of 9% per annum to the interest rate of the above loan, the highest 19% per annum (the overdue interest rate of 0% within one month and 2% within three months, and the interest rate of 1% within one month and 3 months: the first interest rate of 1 month; the interest rate of 376,760,00 won loan commencement date: the loan agreement of this case shall be paid within 1 month from the last day of the loan; the loan agreement of this case shall be made within 3006,706,70

(D) The interest on the loan was paid by December 30, 201, and the expiry date of the loan term of the instant loan agreement was finally extended by March 30, 2012. D. The new bank is a subsidiary securities company (hereinafter “subsidiary securities”) on November 15, 2013.

(1) The Defendant’s loan claim under the instant loan agreement (hereinafter “instant loan claim”) is against the Defendant.

A contract for acquisition of assets to be transferred to B was concluded, and the subsidiary securities on December 24, 2013;

arrow