logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.02.14 2015가합72234
토지인도등
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On Nov. 11, 2008, the Yongsan-si Mayor rendered a decision to alter the permissible urban management planning (the alteration of specific use area and the establishment of the Class I district unit planning) of the wife population Cdong and D Dongwon in Tae-si. and publicly announced it.

According to this, the land indicated in the attached Table (hereinafter referred to as the "land of this case") shall be the land of 12,607 square meters in the daily population E of the Sinsi-si.

The complex land (including a house number F, G, H, and I) was designated as a household number J in the complex site (hereinafter “E site”). B. On January 2, 2009, the G G, H, and I made a public announcement of the designation of a city development zone (including a development plan) with respect to the designation of a city development zone (including a development plan) with the address population as of January 2, 2009, and on the basis thereof, on August 3, 2009, the G Day, 692,120 square meters in the wife population as an urban development zone was designated and publicly announced as a development plan. (c) An urban development project association (hereinafter “instant association”) which obtained authorization to establish an association on August 20, 209.

L urban development project (urban development project may be implemented by the method of expropriation or use or by the method of replotting or by the method of mixing it. The project in this case was implemented by the replotting method;

hereinafter referred to as “instant project”

(3) The Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant implementation plan”) were designated as the implementer of the instant project.

D. According to the instant implementation plan’s authorization, the development plan and the Class-I district unit planning were also modified. According to the foregoing, among the complex sites, the household number F was changed from 12,607 square meters to 12,423 square meters, and the size of the multi-use site was divided into a demarcated-use block M&M (682 square meters in the daily population N in the household population in the city in the city in use) and an O block (11,741 square meters in the daily population in the city in use).

The area including the number No. 1 of the land category is 20m20,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000 m2,000,000 m2,000.

arrow