Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a cargo vehicle B 25 tons.

On July 3, 2017, the defendant operated the above cargo vehicle around 13:05, and proceeded along the 28th national highway crossing in the 2004 Seo-gun, Seocheon-gun, Sung-gun, Sungcheon-gun, by using two-lanes to the non-sections of Sung-gun, Sung-gun.

Since there is a private street crossing where signal lights are installed, it is possible to see the front side and the left side well, and there was a duty of care to drive safely according to the new code.

Nevertheless, when the Defendant neglected this and proceeded straight from the red signal as it is, the Defendant received the front right part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the cargo vehicle of the Defendant from the victim C(58 tax) driving, which was going straight toward the sexual boom of the Gyeong-gun of the Seongbuk-gun of the Sung-gun of the Gyeongsung-gun of the Gyeongsung-gun of the Gyeongsung-gun of the Gyeongnam-gun.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to the above occupational negligence by the F Hospital located in Seongbuk-gun E around 13:52 of the same day, which caused the death of the victim due to two opens.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Reporting the occurrence of a traffic accident, the application of a survey report on actual condition, and on-site photographs statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 286 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution is that there was a serious consequence of the death of the victim due to the instant traffic accident, and that there was a traffic accident resulting from the Defendant’s failure to neglect red signals and the Defendant’s duty of care was not somewhat weak.

However, the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and against himself, and the defendant's bereaved family does not want the punishment of the defendant in consultation with the victim's bereaved family.