The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the Defendant, from October 2010 to the vice president of H (hereinafter “H”) located in G from the Gyeonggi-do Seosung-si (hereinafter “H”), who works for the vice president of H (hereinafter “H”) from around October 1, 201, and who exercises overall control over the overall management of the above company upon delegation by I

A. Since around 1996, the Public Procurement Service’s designation of outstanding goods is designated as excellent goods through evaluation for the products produced by small and medium enterprises with excellent performance, technology, quality, etc. among the products produced by them. If designated as excellent goods, the company can supply them preferentially to public institutions by concluding a multiple contract in accordance with relevant provisions, such as the State Contracts Act, and by concluding a third party unit price contract with the Public Procurement Service, it can directly supply goods using the country’s site.

A person who intends to obtain designation as good goods as above shall apply to each local government procurement office or each government procurement product association of an incorporated association, and the first examination of application documents shall be conducted by the Technology Council for Designation of Outstanding Products, and the second examination shall comprehensively examine the suitability of procurement items based on the results of the first examination at the Contract Examination Council of the Public Procurement Service for the products that passed the first examination, and shall designate good procurement goods by comprehensively examining the feasibility of designation, such as examining the actual status of production sites, etc.

On the other hand, in accordance with the Regulations on Designation and Management of Good Procurement (Public Notice of the Agency for Procurement), the company may apply for the goods produced by it as good procurement (Article 3(1)), and where the application document is forged or falsified or false documents are submitted, it may be excluded from the examination or designation of good goods.

F. (Article 5 (Article 5 (2)), the direct production and origin of the company in designating the above good procurement goods are very important factors, and it is false that the company directly produced the goods even though it did not directly produce the goods.