beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Although the Defendant resided in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government KRW 202,00,000 and monthly rent of KRW 1,600,000, the Defendant was able to obtain money by deception as if he could cause another person to reside as a whole and return the deposit when the period expires.
1. On May 201, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, at the Defendant’s home of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 202, the Defendant: (a) written a statement to the effect that, “The Defendant sought Haice Meet” on the real estate log “E” on the Internet NAV”; (b) reported the statement to the victim D who contacted the victim to the effect that “I will make a deposit on deposit with 30 million won within one room currently being used for 1.6 million won; (c) one of the rooms is able to reside for 1.6 million won from May 20, 201.”
However, in fact, the defendant only resides in monthly income, and there is no right to make a substitute deposit, and even if he/she receives a deposit for lease on a deposit from the victim due to a large amount of debt incurred in operating the shop, he/she did not have the intention or ability to return the deposit
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim and deceiving it from the victim on May 9, 201, received KRW 20 million from the victim, and KRW 28 million from May 20, 201, and acquired KRW 30 million in total as a deposit money.
2. On September 1, 2011, the Defendant against the victim F made a false statement to the effect that “A victim F who reported and contacted the Internet at the above place, as seen above, will make a full deposit on deposit with the victim F, who is currently residing in the former rent of KRW 1.60 million, at one of the three-five millions in use. If the balance is settled, it is possible to reside for six months from October 19, 201.”
However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to return the deposit upon the expiration of the period, even if he received the deposit from the victim due to the above circumstances.
Nevertheless, the defendant.