1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 11, 2015, the Plaintiff received medical care from the Defendant for an accident that is in excess of the food delivery (hereinafter “instant accident”) and provided the Defendant with medical care until September 3, 2018 (hereinafter “the instant injury”). The Plaintiff received from the Defendant for the medical care of the Defendant for the following: (a) he/she was to receive from the Defendant: (b) he/she in the light-to-face fladrocul in the light-to-face in which there is no open address; (c) the second hand of the right hand; (d) the framework of the bones; (e) 3, 4, and 4, and 4, respectively; and (e) he/she was to receive from the Defendant for the instant injury.

B. On September 3, 2018, the Plaintiff applied for disability benefits. On September 19, 2018, the Defendant rendered a disposition against the Plaintiff under class 14 subparag. 10 of the disability grade (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that “the Plaintiff constitutes a person who remains with neical symptoms” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. On January 3, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a request for a review seeking a higher grade of the above disability grade against the instant disposition, but on the ground that “the climatic impairment of the brain substance caused by dub damage is almost little, and there is no apparent physical paralysis symptoms, etc., the Plaintiff dismissed the request for a review on January 3, 2019.”

Accordingly, on April 12, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination, but on the ground that “MRI image does not confirm medical opinions to recognize the decline in recognition function in the state of brain-resistant damage, and falls under the case of trauma pathic (disaster pathic) in the state of symptoms, such as stress disorder and major depression disorder caused by the instant accident, etc.” was dismissed.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap 1, 3 through 7, Eul 1 through 3, the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion shows symptoms of recognition, loyalty, aggressiveness, and character change, such as continuous two copies, pansism, memory, etc., while living a daily life, social activities, and vocational life.