logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.07.14 2016고단1372
명예훼손
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant of the facts charged at the office located on the first floor of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Seoul) around September 2015, and the facts were not the fact that the victim E, the chairperson of the Promotion Committee for the Establishment of the Drebuilding and Improvement Project, did not hold a residents' general meeting at the F community service center on May 16, 2015, and E was elected at the election of the Promotion Committee, but E was elected but E was a 30 owners, such as the land outside the country, etc., and sent 5,000 won in the envelope to the 30 owners, such as the land outside the country, etc., and E was aware of it, and it was reported to enter the Promotion Committee and enter the work.

The “H reply” containing false facts, thereby openly impairing the reputation of the said victim by openly sending it by mail to 600 members, including members I.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the Criminal Act.

However, after the prosecution of this case, the victim E withdraws his wish to punish the defendant by submitting a written agreement stating that the victim E does not want to punish the defendant.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow